Optimizing Wheel and Rail Profiles on
Amtrak's Northeast Corridor
by Eric E. Magel • September 20, 2004
Wheel wear is an inevitable byproduct of wheel/rail
interaction. Excessive wear, however, indicates an imbalance
in some aspect of the wheel/rail interface. Amtrak’s high-speed
Acela trains, running on track with much greater curvature than
other high-speed systems, were quickly found to exhibit very
high rates of wear. Recognizing that this and other wheel/rail
performance issues were best addressed through a proper, systemic
approach, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) sponsored
a program directed at developing methods for improving wheel/rail
performance on Amtrak's Northeast Corridor (NEC). The study focused
on wheel and rail profiles, friction management and rail profile
grinding, and led to the development of
a new Amtrak wheel profile.
High rates of wheel flange wear on the high-speed Acela trains may have been
the catalyst for the investigation, but the study also considered the conventional
Amfleet cars and the 16 other commuter and freight railroads that operate over
the same track on the corridor. Among the considerations are the unfavorable
wheel wear patterns on the conventional fleet, which include a geometrical stress
raiser that develops between adjacent running bands on the wheel and leads to
high stresses on the wheels and the rail (see Figure 1). Also of concern are
hollow-wheels with a false flange condition that impairs wheelset steering and
damages the low rail in curves.
While wheel/rail performance can be characterized by randomly sampling wheels
and rails on a system, each wheel and each section of rail tells only one story.
To obtain a system-wide story, engineers from the National Research Council of
Canada's Centre for Surface Transportation Technology (CSTT) performed a Pummeling
Analysis — a look at the distribution of wheel-to-rail contacts across
the
system — to characterize how a wheel or section of rail is shaped by wheel/rail
interaction, and to validate the performance of custom-designed profiles. This
examination enabled researchers to assess the damage contributed by all of the
wheels—new wheels, worn wheels, leading axles, trailing axles, heavy axle
loads, light axle loads — passing a specific section of track.
|
DECEMBER 2004
"Designing Amtrak's
Wayside Train/Track Interaction Detection System"
READ
ARTICLE
SEPTEMBER
2004
"Developing an Enterprise Asset Management System for Amtrak’s Northeast
Corridor"
READ
ARTICLE
SEPTEMBER 2004
"Monitoring Vehicle/Track Interaction
on Amtrak's NEC"
READ
ARTICLE
|
|

Register to receive free editorial updates and current information from
Interface Journal
CLICK HERE |
|
|