Interface Journal.com
Home Features News Forum Company Contact Us Sponsors search, site map, login
  Curving Resistance | Rail Cant (1) | WRI '08 Seminar (2) | Out of Round Wheels | P&S Directory | ARCHIVES  
 
  RAIL CANT
 
Effects of Rail Cant on Wheel/Rail Forces and Derailment Potential
(continued)


Undesirable rail cant is created when the outside of the plate cuts significantly more than the inside. There are three stages of differential rail cant:
• Stage 1: approximately 1/4-inch of differential cutting.
• Stage 2: 1/2- to 5/8-inch of differential cutting.
• Stage 3: 1 inch or more of differential cutting (which represents about a 3-degree cant angle).

The causes of negative rail cant include:

• Excessive superelevation, which causes high vertical forces on the low rail of curves. This occurs when the elevation of a curve is not properly matched to actual speeds. With more coal and other long trains operating on the system, train speeds on some lines are considerably less than what they were 10 years ago. In other instances, a curve may be properly balanced but trains may be running under the balance speed because of slow orders or approach signals on the line. Operating under balance speed can also cause spalling, flattening and pummeling of the low rail.
• High-center-of-gravity cars such as grain or double-stack cars. The higher the center of gravity, the higher the roll moment that they put on the rail, which can aggravate the condition.
• Operating at overbalance speeds, which can generate excessive force against the high rail. While trains operated at less than design speed may vertically load the low rail, operating above the design speed can throw more weight against the high rail and cause it to roll to the outside. Running over balance leads to heavy field-side plate cutting and gauge corner shelling on the rail.

Negative cant conditions increase the potential for rail rollover, wheel climb and reverse wheelset steering. Rail rollover potential can be calculated by the ratio of the base to the height of the rail. The lateral loads act on a moment arm that is roughly 7 inches above the top of rail. That force tends to roll the rail outward, in clockwise direction. Vertical loads are applied near the gauge corner creating a moment at a dimension approximately 4-1/2 inches across from the pivot point at the base (see Figure 1). This represents the point at which the vertical loads are attempting to roll the rail back down in a counterclockwise direction. When balanced, these opposing forces hold the rail in place. An L/V of about 0.64 is required to initiate rolling in a typical new rail section.

Curve-worn rail, however, affects the positioning of these forces. The lateral load might act on the gauge face at a height of 6.85 inches and the vertical load might be transferred through two-point contact more closely to the center of the rail, yielding a base dimension of 3 inches. So for severely curve-worn rail, the L/V required to roll that rail section is about 0.4. As a result, rail wear represents a significant factor in whether a given curve will have a tendency to roll.

< PREVIOUS PAGE  |  PAGE 2 OF 4 |  NEXT PAGE >



OFFICIAL SPONSOR


Click here for details
OFFICIAL SPONSOR

Click here for details
OFFICIAL SPONSOR

Click here for details
OFFICIAL SPONSOR

Click here for details
OFFICIAL SPONSOR

Click here for details
OFFICIAL SPONSOR

Click here for details

Click here for details





AUGUST 2004
"Controlling Top-of-Rail Friction"
READ ARTICLE


Register to receive free editorial updates and current information from Interface Journal
CLICK HERE