Drilling Down to Top-of-Rail Friction
Control (continued)
The Portland, Ore., Tri-Met system, for
example, uses an SRS pump and activation system that is housed
beneath a cover plate in the street (see Figure 1 on previous
page).
A
vibration sensor activates the pump and the lubricant is pumped through
a 3/16-inch-diameter hole drilled into the rail at a 70-degree
angle to the gauge face (see Figure 2). The location of the
hole through which the lubricant or friction modifier is
applied can be angled more toward the top of rail to provide
better top-of-rail coverage, or toward the gauge corner for
better gauge-face lubrication. "Provided the output
is properly controlled, there's very little waste," Reiff
said. This is particularly attractive in public areas with
foot traffic.
Also attractive is that the likelihood of over-application
of grease or friction modifier is minimized. Significantly
less lubricant is applied for every wheel
pass when compared to traditional wayside applicators. This also means, however,
that each applicator is able to cover a smaller area—one or two curves,
at most.
One of the drawbacks to the system is that the applicator can't
easily be moved "Once
you drill a hole in the rail, it's fixed," Reiff said. There's little in
the way of adjustment that can be done. "If the location is not right, if
it's too high or too low, a new hole must be drilled." And while transit
systems don't change rails as often as freight railroads must, when rail is renewed,
a new hole must be drilled.
While most of the Tri-Met applications are in embedded track, an open track site
that better accommodated a hand tribometer was used for the tests. Microphones
were located outside each track and between them. Four lubricants (three greases
and one quasi-friction modifier) were tested over a two-week period. Effectiveness
was measured at two carry distances, 200 feet and 1,200 feet from the applicators,
which were located near the entrance to 8-degree and 8-degree reverse curves.
Depending on the lubricant, friction levels attained a steady state of about
0.3 at the gauge face and about 0.35 at the top of the rail after 50 - 120 axle
passes in the 200-foot zone and 85 - 180 axle passes in the 1,200-foot zone.
Effectiveness dropped off significantly beyond 1,500 feet from the applicator.
|
JANUARY 2005
"Reducing
Noise and Vibration on NYCT"
READ
ARTICLE
NOVEMBER 2004
"Examining Wheel/Rail
Interaction on Rail Transit Systems"
READ
ARTICLE
AUGUST 2004
"Controlling
Top-of-Rail Friction"
READ
ARTICLE
|
|

Register to receive free editorial updates and current information from
Interface Journal
CLICK HERE |
|
|