 |
|
Effects
of Wide Gauge on Derailment Potential
(part 2 of 2)
(continued)
|
Stiff or Warped Truck Conditions
"Truck Warp: Causes and Cures" (Part 1 of 2) showed how warped
trucks caused poor steering and excessive gauge spreading forces.
Trucks warp, or parallelogram, for a variety of reasons. Conditions
in the centerbowl or bolster can cause an increase in truck turning
moment. These include:
• Interference at the centerbowl rim with the body centerplate.
• Fastener contact anywhere around the centerbowl rim.
• Incorrect repairs or rough centerplate surface.
• Insufficient, or tight, side bearing clearance (one or both sides).
• Excessive wear in the bowl or centerplate causing an egg-shaped
condition.
• Incorrectly or overloaded car on one side.
Other factors can lead to poor truck steering. These include:
• Mismatched side frames (button mismatch).
• Mismatched wheel diameters (wheel tape sizes).
• Hollow worn wheels.
• Wedge rise or lack of damping.
If a detailed mechanical inspection of the first derailed vehicle
reveals that one, several or many of these mechanical conditions
are present, the primary cause of the "wide gauge" derailment
may be of mechanical origin. In other words, the track structure
was able to restrain normal gauge spreading forces, but not the
excessive lateral forces that a particular car was generating.
In a case like this, it is more appropriate to assign a mechanical
code such as E46C: "Truck Bolster Stiff, Improper Swiveling." It's
important to recognize that yard and industry tracks are built
to standards designed to accommodate lower speed, and lower wheelset
force environments. If excessive forces are placed on these tracks
due to a poor mechanical curving condition, the appropriate cause
code should begin with a "E" not a "T."
Human Error during Switching
Spread gauge derailments also occur on good track with no obvious
mechanical problem. In cases like these, human error may be the
cause of a derailment. Poor train handling, even during switching,
can cause excessive slack action, which leads to excessive drawbar
forces. The forces imparted into the drawbars of freight cars
are eventually transferred to the centerbowl, through the bolster,
into the side frames, and eventually into the wheels. Thus, these
drawbar forces are additives to all the other normal curving
forces, and can overwhelm the track structure. When engineers
use too much independent braking effort or excessive dynamic
braking, excessive buff forces can be developed. Also, shoving
against a heavy air brake reduction can likewise create heavy
buff forces in the train. Simulations show that when buff forces
exceed about 250 kips, the potential exists for compromising
the gauge of nominal track. Bypassed couplers in switching operations
can also exert tremendous lateral gauge-spreading pressure against
the rails. Investigators should look for evidence of coupler
impact or coupler shank contact against the side of the striker
casting.
All of this is to say that the T110 "wide gauge" cause
code should be assigned to a derailment in which the gauge measures
in excess of FRA requirements. But before routinely assigning
the T110 code, the role of human error and mechanical causes
should also be examined.
Gary P. Wolf is President of Rail
Sciences Inc.
|
DECEMBER 2004
"Effects
of Wide Gauge on Derailment Potential (Part
1 of 2)"
READ
ARTICLE
SEPTEMBER 2004
"Truck Warp:
Causes and Cures (Part 1 of 2)"
READ
ARTICLE
OCTOBER 2004
"Truck Warp: Causes
and Cures (Part 2 of 2)"
READ
ARTICLE
AUGUST 2004
"Effects of Rail Cant
on Wheel/Rail Forces and Derailment Potential"
READ
ARTICLE
|
|

Register to receive free editorial updates and current information from
Interface Journal
CLICK HERE |
|
|